By Steven Pinker (2018)
Allan Lane, imprint of Penguin Books, 452 pages
Terror attacks, droughts and civil wars could easily make us depressed and it is easy to think that everything was better in the past.
Steven Pinker, evolutionary psychologist and professor of psychology at Harvard, is one of the voices that claim the opposite. He has already demonstrated how much less violent our world is in the book Better Angels of our nature (2011).
In Enlightenment Now, the case for reason science, humanism and progress, Pinker shows how the world has improved the last 200 years, how the ideals of the Enlightenment caused this progress, and how we can maintain our course for the future.
Overdramatic world view
Pinker argues that we should not have too much faith in the news. Media focus on negative events, we overestimate this and larger picture gets unnoticed. We are not as rational as we would like to be, and a combination of this, lack of information and different cognitive biases leads to an overdramatic world view.
The middle part of the book is a thorough account for how the world has improved in almost every possible way. Topics such as average life span, happiness, economic wealth, health access to food, medicine, war, inequality, peace, safety, education, gender equality, and democracy is given a separate chapter each. You could read these topics chronologically, but you could equally also read them in any order you like.
The share of people living in extreme poverty was about 90% not even 200 years ago. The percentage of people in extreme poverty has been dramatically reduced since then, the absolute number has been more than halved since the 1970s. Despite that the world population has increased from 3,7 billion to 7,3 billion! The share of people living in extreme poverty is now less than 10%!
Max Roser, economist at the University of Oxford and founder of Our World in Data, has been quoted saying that the news papers could have run the following headline:The number of people in extreme poverty has been reduced by 137 000 since yesterday! every day the last 25 years.
The impression that the world was a much better place is therefore not just a misunderstanding, but a fundamentally wrong view of the world.
There can be no question of which was the greatest era for culture; the answer has to be today, until it is superseded by tomorrow.
Climate crisis
Even if Pinker wants to show how the world has moved forward and is much better today he does not trivialize the challenges we are facing with the climate crisis. He means that this crisis should be dealt with using the tools weve inherited from The Enlightenment. The climate crisis is a global problem we have never encountered before. An increase in greenhouse gases like carbondioxide and methane leads to increased ocean levels, more extreme weather, droughts some places and more flooding in other locations. Which in turn can lead to failed crops. National and international crisis follows. To stay within the 2-degree goal the amount of greenhouse gas has to be reduced to at least half within this century and by much more within the next.
Connection between energy production and progress
Today we get about 86% of our energy production from fossil fuels. The majority of our energy use goes to heavy industry, transportation, buildings and agriculture. Needless to say, ridding the world of fossil fuels a monumental task.
Energy channeled by knowledge is the elixir with which we stave off entropy, and advances in energy capture are advances in human destiny.
Pinker makes a valid point when he claims that this is nothing we can fix just by recycling our garbage and eat organic food, which uses a much larger area of land mass than intensive agriculture. A main part of the climate crisis is that it is a tragedy of the commons. It is a global problem and needs to be solved globally. And not by reducing our use of energy. An often overlooked problem is that reducing poverty, increased education, better health care and all other fruits of progress requires vast amounts of energy. The solution of the climate crisis cannot therefore be cutting the use of energy to start with. Even if renewable energy sources have a certain potential they are simply not ready to replace fossil fuels just yet.
Nuclear power as the solution to the climate crisis
Nuclear power has no carbon footprint what so ever. Besides the process of building the power plant itself. The exhaust coming from nuclear power plants is pure water vapor. Nuclear power has had extremely few deaths and there is no pollution to speak of. Fossil fuels are responsible for approximately 1 million deaths per year. When you compare number of deaths by the different energy sources nuclear power is by far the safest!
Pinker basically shows how fossil energy production is far worse for human suffering, death, and the climate crisis than nuclear power is. Compared to fossil fuels this should be a no brainer. He concludes therefore that we should shut down coal plants and build a lot more nuclear plants. Not the other way around like a lot of countries like Germany, India and China does today.
Secular humanism
Towards the end of the book Pinker talks about reason, science and humanism and what threatens these values. He shows that when people of very different background sits down to make common rules they very often end up with a form of secular humanism. The most known examples are the American declaration of independence and the UN declaration of human rights. It is Pinkers opinion that a humanistic moral, that you get from UN declaration of Human Rights, should be the guiding moral for the development of society. And to be clear he does not imply atheistic humanism exclusively. All forms of liberal humanism whether it is in the cloak of a lutheran, muslim, or buddist is a part of this larger concept of humanism.
Warning of all forms of extremism
Pinker warns us about right wing extremism, left wing communist romantisism and Islamic extremism. All three political ideologies have millions of deaths on their conscience, and they struggle towards a eutopian world. Together with populism and nasjonalism they threaten to dismantle the stabile institutions weve had in place since world war two.
Any jackass can kick down a barn, but it takes a carpenter to build one.
Radical change is counter productive according to Pinker. We simply have to do more of what we are already doing. Pinker is probably more positively inclined, without being a naive dreamer.
Progress is not an automatic process and will not happen at the same rate all the time or in all places. But just like weve solved many other problems todays challenges will also be solved. As long as we cherish the values and ideals like reason, science and humanism.
Rating: 6/6
#StevenPinker #EnlightenmentNow #bokanmeldelse #bookreview #mementomori #climatechange
